Wednesday, May 05, 2010

Bante quote

From The Yogi's Joy p.170:

One's personality is not set in stone. It may seem as though there is nothing you can do about who you are, but if the Dharma is about anything it is about our inherent capacity to change our inherent conditioning.

Monday, May 03, 2010

talk by Subhuti

why

Our monthly mitra meeting, we have been telling life stories. (You can check out the "why I am a Buddhist" stories on the LBC talks page.)

Telling my story was a powerful activity for me, and I could see that others felt closer to me, grateful that I shared it with them. I was grateful to hear other's stories and felt I was closer to them. It's been a very powerful sangha building activity.

I recorded mine, and played it to some friends. One friend suggested I listen to a Ted Talk, about the importance of why. I found the talk on YouTube. It's by Simon Sinek, who I must admit I know nothing about, except what I see in this Ted Talk.

Now I thought I did OK on the why in my little talk, but I thought it would be an interesting practice to elaborate further here.

In my talk I talked about how great the other guys were. So on one level the why of Dharma practice for me is because I have met really amazing people that I really respect, and I like to be around them. But I met awesome people in social work school, I meet awesome people all the time. There is a framework that keeps me meeting these awesome people every year on my ordination retreats, but people get ordained and generally stop coming after a while. (You're allowed to keep coming for a while after ordination.) The larger sangha is awesome. Lots of people come through NYC, and hook up with the sangha, and they are always really cool, interesting soulful people, whom I like to be around, I like to get to know better.

One day on retreat, I was crying a lot in meditation. I was experiencing a kind of primal sadness that is hard to describe, that happens when I meditate a lot. When I came down to my room, on my bed, was a brownie. Someone saw me crying, or maybe just wanted to do something nice, and they left the brownie as a kind thing. Maybe they put a brownie on everyone's pillow and my roommate already ate his. It didn't matter. When I wondered at who could have done that, I thought, "Everyone here could have done that." That's how cool everyone is in the male ordination process that I spend time with on retreat, and the order members who support the retreat.

The other why I mentioned in my talk was that I felt meditation was really healthy. I'm not just meaning feeling good after lifting weights, I mean I feel more healthy in that I feel more receptive to others, I see the lines of more pure actions, how I can positively influence others, I see what my "why" is more clearly. I gain clarity, I process my trauma so that I don't spit it back out unknowingly.

I went on a retreat at the end of 2002 at Aryaloka, in Newmarket New Hampshire. I meditated much of the day, went for walks, talked with others, ate healthy vegetarian food, and learned to love chanting (called puja) and read. Enlightenment came out of meditative experience for the Buddha. I touched on something that blew my mind, I can't even say what it is. My friend talks about glimpses over the wall, and I think the glimpse over a wall on retreat, it's beyond words. Not beyond words in terms of enlightenment, I'm not saying that. I'm just saying it was mind blowing in a healthy way.

Energy is another why I practice the Dharma. I get energy from meditation, reading the Dharma, my friendships and interaction with Sangha. The practices of Buddhism feel very meaningful. When I am with other people in this way I feel connected to something bigger than myself. My grandfather used to criticize my atheism, "but there's nothing bigger than yourself!" Well, in Buddhism that's perhaps the Transcendental Principle or The Dharma or the Three Jewels. The meaning in practicing the Dharma, experiencing sangha, gives me energy.

The Dharma feels profoundly respectful and encouraging. There are a wide variety of practices, from chanting, to altruistic activities, to meditation, to studying and thinking, to spiritual fellowship. Buddhism is the pragmatic advice on the path to enlightenment; from that perspective there is no Buddhist philosophy or theology. You can look at the Yogacara as a philosophy, but I think it's more like a psychological outlook, that grows out of meditative experience. The respect in the Dharma is that we test our own experience about whether something is beneficial for us. It's encouraging in that the sangha supports one. We can use consolation as well as confrontation, self and other power. But I have felt profound encouragement, respecting me.

The why is the inner journey. We've climbed the tallest mountains, gone to the poles, gone deep into the ocean, gone into outer space, the moon. People have done amazing things. There's a marathon that's 135 miles through a hot desert, the Badwater. But can we really say we understand humans in their depth and potential? Do I understand myself. They say you go into therapy sure you know who you are, and come out uncertain and curious.

Here's a quote from a blog I read, from Jung:

"... the principal aim of psychotherapy is not to transport the patient to an impossible state of happiness, but to help him acquire steadfastness and philosophic patience in face of suffering. Life demands for its completion and fulfillment a balance between joy and sorrow." Jung CW 16, p.81

Since I'm a psychotherapist I see the journey in therapy as parallel and complementary, as in any spiritual journey. I know some dislike the importing modern psychology into the Dharma, they feel they have quite enough with the Dharma, thank you. I do it not because I think others should do it, but because that's who I am.

The confrontation of suffering, was, in my opinion, the most interesting chapter in Stephen Batchelor's latest memoir, though there was quite a lot that was interesting in the book. Here is just one wonderful quote from the chapter on suffering (12):

"The aim of mindfulness is to know suffering fully. It entails paying calm, unflinching attention to whatever impacts the organism, be it the song of a lark or the scream of a child, the bubbling of a playful idea or a twinge in the lower back. You attend not just to the outward stimuli themselves, but equally to your inward reactions to them. You do not condemn what you see as your failings or applaud what you regard as success. You notice things coming, you notice them go. Over time, the practice becomes less a self-conscious exercise in meditation done at fixed periods each day and more a sensibility that infuses one's awareness at all times."

So they "why" of Dharma practice is for me, is that it's the most meaningful, healthy, energizing, supportive, connecting, helping, respectful, thing I have found on the inner journey.

Monday, April 19, 2010

diamond vessel

"The quiet generosity of those who possess almost nothing is a treasure in itself."

p.133 The Yogi's Joy

"... our practice is not to fill ourselves with profound and precious teachings but to make ourselves fit to receive them, to become a strong, unbreakable vessel, even a diamond vessel."

p.135

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Lentle Mitra


Shrine
Originally uploaded by sravacitta
Here is the shrine for our practice day today, where we meditate, talk about our lives and the Dharma. The mitra sangha continues to grow, we had a mitra ceremony. Instead of tossing rice, we tossed lentles so I called her the lentle mitra.

Thursday, April 08, 2010

Confession of a Buddhist Atheist

"To steady one's gaze on the finitude, contingency, and anguish of one's existence is not easy; it requires mindfulness and concentration."

Stephen Batchelor in Confession of a Buddhist Atheist

I'm reading it on a kindle, so no page reference.

I'm thinking of developing a puja from some of his writings.

I am enjoying this book. I like the intellectual tour de force. I've read his other books. I like his freedom of thought. He's more into confrontation than consolation. He dislikes other power. He does not discuss sangha much, mostly in terms of disagreement. When I met him he said the other star Buddhists he hangs out with are his sangha and the editorial staff at Tricycle, but I thought that wasn't really a satisfactory answer. He was quite gracious to meet with the FWBO NYC sangha. He gave us a signed book, which was very generous. (Give it back Andrew!) Nevertheless this was an awesome book in many ways, and I really like him as a writer. I highly recommend all his works, and this latest is another sterling book that I quite enjoyed. An excellent blend of the personal and thoughts, practice and experiences.

Sunday, February 21, 2010

More on Tiger

The Dali Lama has commented on Tiger Woods. I find it so fascinating that the leader of one of six Tibetan groups, is seen as a kind of pope of Buddhism, when in fact Buddhism has been very good at resisting a central authority. Even in my own realitively small fledgling group, the former FWBO, now know as Triratina Buddhist Community. I wonder what other Buddhist leaders are going to be questioned by journalists.

I can't be bothered to verify if this is true, but according to this article, the home of Brit Hume, Fox has edited out his statement about Buddhism. I like it, in the comments someone calls it "Faux Noiz".

This article quotes Tiger as saying he doesn't believe in Enlightenment.

I believe in Enlightenment. Today on our practice day I'm going to talk about the 3 Fetters, which if they are broken, lead to stream entry. Your being has a momentum that will end in Enlightenment. It is seen as a realistic goal.

Tiger might consider this lovely talk to help clarify his ideas of Enlightenment.

And here's a link that collects links on this subject.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Tiger

He says in his statement today,

"I have a lot of work to do, and I intend to dedicate myself to doing it. Part of following this path for me is Buddhism, which my mother taught me at a young age. People probably don't realize it, but I was raised a Buddhist, and I actively practiced my faith from childhood until I drifted away from it in recent years. Buddhism teaches that a craving for things outside ourselves causes an unhappy and pointless search for security. It teaches me to stop following every impulse and to learn restraint. Obviously I lost track of what I was taught."

I can't help but think of Brit Hume and his suggestion that Tiger move to Christianity for the forgiveness. I wonder if Tiger was specifically addressing that, or if he was just saying what was important to him.

I think it's interesting he called it a "Faith". I think of it more as a path, faith isn't really emphasized in Buddhism.

This inside and outside distinction is interesting too. Security? I think it's more about happiness. Anyway, it's not far off.

So our most famous Buddhist continues to retain the label.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Wildmind Book Review

It is my utmost honor to be published in Wildmind for a book review. Bodhipaksa is an excellent editor and an awesome writer. I can't wait till his book comes out. I read some drafts. I think after The Essential Sangharakshita, it will be the second most important book of the decade. I don't think I like the book because he's a friend and editor. Sometimes he freaks me out with his intelligence, stillness and wisdom, in a good way.

You know, I'm just one person, and the way I feel about books from within the order is different from books produced outside the order. I've been totally dragging my feet on a book review on Milarepa by Sangharakshita because the book just freaks me out it feels so deep. I have a feeling this by book Bodhipaska will be in my all time top 10, which include Vessantara's Meeting The Buddhas, A Survey of Buddhism and Know Your Mind by Sangharakshita, Stephen Batchelor's Buddhism Without Belief, The Hundred Verses of Advice by Dilgo Khyentse & Padampa Sangye, A Deeper Beauty by Paramananda, Touching Enlightenment by Reginald Ray, Zen Mind, Beginners Mind, and Nothing Special.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Mantra

It came as the biggest surprise to me that mantra and puja would effect me. On the last retreat, a new one infected me. I think in a way that's the power of a rock and roll chorus. I've been singing, from Neil Young:

Old Man, take a look at my life
I'm a lot like you
I want someone to love me
the whole day through
take one look in my eye
you can see it's true

Now what does that mantra say? It's about indentification with the father. It's about the desire to be love, but to be loved all day. It's about looks in the eye, but I think it's also being loved for your true self, being a subject and not an object that functions for other people. For someone to want to know how you feel, regardless if it hurts them a bit, so that there's greater intimacy.

It's poetry that can't be reduced, like "jewel in the lotus" with is "om mani padme hum" I can't help but look as popular music as worldly and sometimes not good mantras. Sometimes.

I can't help add in, after the fact, this posting about song fixing the damaged mind.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

quote from a spiritual memior

I enjoyed this quote from This Side of Nirvana by Sara Jenkins:

"Looking back at how others seem to have guided and eased my journey, those who were the most helpful were not (as far as I know) attempting to do anything for me. They were simply following their own path." (p210)

I find it interesting how we influence each other and what fosters positive change in people.

I have read probably 8 Buddhist memoirs, and I'd say this is the best one I've read: Good writing, good storytelling, spiritual insight and friendships, not too long. I like Sangharakshita's 5 memiors, but they are so long and really try to cover his long life, they are not as focused as this single volume. This is an honest account of an average person's struggles in practice on the path.

I think the other memoirs don't give away as much of the struggle, they were people who just took off. Sangharakshita's story is amazing in many ways, but also not so much of our times. To actually go forth the way Sangharakshita did, without any possessions. All the famous people and famous times he lived through are cool.

Friday, February 12, 2010

How did I get into Buddhism?

A friend asked me: How did I get into Buddhism?

There are some factors that contribute to that fatal day in the summer of 2002, when I first took a meditation class with Vajramati. I mark that day as the beginning of more actively becoming a Buddhist through meditation and spiritual fellowship.

Growing up, my mother and father were atheist secular humanists. I think that’s still what they are. One set of grandparents were Baptist, the other Episcopal. So I spent my summers going to church and learning the Christian doctrines. I love my grandparents. They were trying to inculcate me in their tradition. But I never cottoned to Christianity. Never felt it. As soon I can could think I was justifying why I didn’t believe in God. In part it was what drew me to philosophy. How can you say that god does not exist? Now let me be clear. I have friends who do embrace a theistic spirituality and I see the beauty it has for them. I'm not saying people shouldn't embrace the spirituality they find works for them. I'm not saying it can't be beautiful. I'm just saying it did not work for me, and that that was important because I would later find something that did work for me.

In college I read some Zen stuff. I think I understand where they are coming from now, I enjoy the perfection of wisdom, like the idea of transcending dualism. My mother was born in Japan during the occupation; my great grandmother was called “Ba”, short for obasan. But it seemed like an exotic confusing aesthetic, and I didn’t have the context to really understand it. I had no spiritual community or meditative experience.

I watched my stepfather meditate twice a day since about the age of 8, and I’d always wanted to try it. So at the tender age of 35, the age the Buddha became enlightened, I tried a meditation class. Every step I have taken has confirmed me it is the right path. After a month, I stayed after the meditation class for the free Dharma discussion. I happened to be unemployed at the time, and I read a lot of Sangharakshita. In my opinion he has the best exposition of Buddhism. I’d say The Essential Sangharakshita is an instant world spiritual classic, virtually a Mahayana sutra.

I’d also note that I had read some more Buddhism along the way, especially Charlotte “Joko” Beck. I think that’s when I realized the psychological benefits of meditation without actually doing it. I collected little Hotei statues every time I went to a Chinatown. Why was I drawn to these statues? Why was that the thing I collected? Not sure. Now I know Hotei is a folk hero. Now maybe it’s a superficial act, but I feel it’s a kind of response to an icon of Buddhism. There are all kinds of responses. There are many paths and many techniques and many practices that are useful on the path to enlightenment. I feel opening up to that has really helped me.

So I take meditation class in 2002. All spiritual traditions can use meditation, but Buddhism takes it further. The insights can be parroted, but you gain insight only when you grok these meditative insights. You can learn the mindfulness of breathing and be of any denomination.

So the more and more I delve into it, the deeper I’m drawn toward it. I’m a fairly incredulous person. What I like about the practical spiritual teachings that lead to enlightenment is that it’s not a philosophy, nothing to quibble about. Does it work for you? Then it’s Dharma. The idealism of the Yogacara is a kind of way of being that leads to enlightenment, not something to refute philosophically. What you’re experiencing matters. You test it in your own experience. Your experience is part of the equation. Yogacara makes sense with meditative experience.

Reading Stephen Batchelor’s Buddhism Without Belief, I realized there was a path in Buddhism that doesn’t force me to believe in reincarnation. All Buddhist traditions have reincarnation, and I don’t want to dismiss it because it’s foreign. But the point is, it’s a pragmatic course of action, and belief isn’t really what is important. I had found a spirituality that didn’t require me to swallow something I didn’t believe in. I’m not motivated by getting a good rebirth. If that works for someone, well, more power to them.

I also liked Batchelor's confrontation, even if sometimes you want some consolation in spirituality.

I got into meditation. I did a practice day where we meditated a few times consecutively, and then I went on a weeklong retreat at Aryaloka. That blew my mind. I’m still trying to process what happened. I highly recommend going on retreat.

So I became a mitra (friend) and then asked for ordination, and gone on the most awesome retreats, with the most awesome people. Every step I take makes me more confident this is the path for me. This blog is about my journey towards ordination, and hopefully beyond.

I suppose I’ve gloss over the revelations of the spiritual friendship, Bodhisattva Ideal, the use of archetypal Buddhas, mantra. Up till I took the meditation class, all was preparation to make me receptive to the Dharma, spiritual friendship. Sangharakshita’s exposition of the Dharma has clarified so many things for me; he’s a spiritual genius. So many friends along the way have added to my understanding, all the generous teachers who have come. I’ve learned so much listening to Dharma talks from Free Buddist Audio. I happen to be listening to Subhuti's Rambles Aroudn the Yogachara. I have an old post that lists my favorites (at the time, but still holds up pretty true).

That’s an answer to how I became a Buddhist, how I found Buddhism and a little about what it does for me.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

The Brit Hume of Singapore?

There's a post on Shambhala SunSpace, that has videos of ministers slagging off Buddhism.

In the end, I think of section 64 of the patience chapter of the Bodhicaryavatara, is my ultimate response:

"My hatred toward those who revile and violate images, stupas, and the sublime Dharma is wrong, because the Buddhas and the like are free of distress."

Saturday, February 06, 2010

this side of nirvana

In Sara Jenkins spiritual memoir, she writes, "I tried to pretend that it was all as wonderful in the moment as I knew it would be in retrospect." (P.28).

I think quote captures Jenkins' style, she's honest in her yearning and where she is. What is this feeling that we could be a better person, and yet we need to stay grounded in who we really are?

I find how we work with spiritual ideals really interesting. It's so tempting to just ape being a good Buddhist, for me. The more silent you are the more others can project spiritual depth onto you. The challenge is to open your mouth and create a real relationship with others, who really know you and have a sense of what you can be. It's lovely to be seen not for just what you are, but also what you would like to become. This is something you have to be in tune with someone else to really grasp more or less accurately. Finding these deep relationships is not easy in this world of distraction and struggle for existence, which really means a comfortable existence with the right about of entertainment gadgets (for me, for me, I'm always just really talking about my experience, I can't really presume to know you, dear reader). Writing this I think I need to think more about my digital distraction! I'm going close my laptop and go meditate!

PS--Over at Bodhi Tree Swaying, he shares his lovely musical taste.

Also just read Jayarava's lovely post.

And I just found this lovely new blog: Insight Young Voices, about Dalit youth in India.